The problem with Thomas’
assessment comes from a review that Pat Buchanan, no liberal he,
gave to the process that indicted Libby. Wrote Buchanan, "In
contrast to Congress, Pat Fitzgerald came to Washington and did
the job he was assigned to do. He carried out his mandate, but
refused to go beyond it. He indicted for what he believed were
violations of law, not violations of ethics – and only on the
charges he believed he could prove beyond a reasonable doubt. We
need more public servants with this kind of conscience – and
conscientiousness."
Buchanan, by the way, has been credited with
declaring a culture war in his speech to the 1992 Republican
National Convention when he said that the coming contest between
former President George H.W. Bush and then-Arkansas Governor
Bill Clinton was an, "election...about much more than who gets
what. It is about who we are. It is about what we believe. It is
about what we stand for as Americans. There is a religious war
going on in our country for the soul of America. It is a
cultural war, as critical to the kind of nation we will one day
be as was the Cold War itself."
Who, then, is right about the nature of
problems facing officials who have climbed to power with the
help of Christian political support? Or is it more reasonable to
wonder if Christians can actually be misled to support
politicians who will abuse their power and fall to the
temptations that infect government with corruption?
American government has become dominated by a
handful of centrally located political celebrities who can
escape any direct scrutiny by their constituents. This
detachment from those who give them their jobs allows them the
freedom to be what they want and claim to be what their
supporters desire. Job security for them demands little more
than a routine "tickling of the ears" on regular elections
cycles.
America, however, needs models of integrity
and humility. These are qualities that are proven through
intimate observations of individual lives, not noble claims from
campaign speeches. Many Christians have forgotten this notion as
they have blindly trusted America's top political party to
protect and preserve their interests. Recent political polls
that seem to suggest that the Republican leaders cannot even
protect and preserve the best interests of the Republican Party
only compound insult with injury for conservative Christian
voters.
The GOP catapulted to political majorities
throughout America with promises of reducing the influence of
the federal government in our daily lives, restoring fiscal
responsibility to government, and removing corruption and spin
doctoring from the political process. More than a decade of
their control has proven these promises empty. This does not
mean the goals are not achievable. It does mean that a political
organization clearly devoted to absorbing power unto its
centrally organized leadership is highly unlikely to pursue them
with any urgency or forthrightness.
This suggestion leaves Christian activists
with an interesting dilemma: Do they act on their own to
reestablish the principles and virtues that they believe can
restore stability to this nation and its communities, or do they
pass that responsibility on to a national political organization
with a record of violating those principles?
From here the question does not seem too
difficult to answer.
By
Bob Strodtbeck
Columnist
Bob Strodtbeck has been writing editorial
commentaries since 1993. He has professional experiences in
pharmaceuticals, radio, and education. He has also served as a church
elder in an Orlando congregation where he has made his home since 1986.rvstrodtbeck@peoplepc.com
Related Books
Keywords and misspellings:
Christian right rite christain conseravtive conservative