Web www.bestsyndication.com
Click here for discounted Textbooks


 

Subscribe to our news

Enter your email address:


Add to Google
Add to My AOL  


Evolution vs. the Observations of Moses

Evolution vs. the Observations of Moses

The dictionary gives the following definitions for biological evolution:

1. Change in the genetic composition of a population during successive generations, as a result of natural selection acting on the genetic variation among individuals, and resulting in the development of new species.

2. The historical development of a related group of organisms; phylogeny.

The definition for phylogeny is as follows:

The sequence of events involved in the evolutionary development of a species or taxonomic group of organisms

Evolution is a fundamental concept in modern biology. Biology is defined as being:

1. The science of life and of living organisms, including their structure, function, growth, origin, evolution, and distribution. It includes botany and zoology.

2. The life processes or characteristic phenomena of a group or category of living organisms.

Now, we reach the point of discussing the history of living organisms. When biology is taught to our students in public schools, what are they required to learn? It is the theory of evolution, and any and all other explanations are excluded. Secular science is dogmatic about trying to establish evolution as an undeniable fact, and is not interested in accepting or exploring other possibilities, no matter how plausible they may be.

Lets look deeper into evolution. The theory does not take the responsibility of stating how life originated. It delegates that to the theory of the “Big Bang”, which states that all matter in the universe was somehow contained in a very small dense hot atom, molecule, or singularity, which exploded into all the elements and celestial bodies of the universe,
about 16 billion years ago.

Never mind what caused that to happen, the origin of the dense entity, or what was in existence thirty trillion Earth years ago. Somehow, that explosion of inorganic matter is to have produced organic attributes somewhere in outer space that would later find its way to planet Earth and begin to grow.

But before we talk about the growth of life forms, we have to accept the theory that our solar system was formed from a previous exploded star, which condensed and exploded, much like the Big Bang theory. However, this was on a relatively small scale. This is called the Nebular Hypothesis, which has the cloud of gas and dust to start spinning and flattening out to form the shape of a rotating pancake, with a bulge in the middle. As the nebula collapses further, instabilities in the collapsing, rotating cloud cause local regions to begin to contract gravitationally. These local regions of condensation become the Sun (which was the bulge in the center) and the planets, as well as their moons and other debris in the Solar System. Never mind that the nebula was not uniform and that the local regions had their own unique composition.

Now, with supposition upon supposition, we have the Earth formed, and many years passing by as it cools and becomes suitable for life. I guess that the molecules of life had to remain in a holding patterning around Earth until the conditions were “just right” to sustain life and get the “primordial soup” ready.

The Primordial Soup Theory suggests that life began in a pond or ocean as a result of the combination of chemicals from Earth’s atmosphere and some form of energy to make amino acids, the building blocks of proteins, which would then supposedly evolve into all the species.

For decades, evolutionists have been claiming, that the first life on Earth appeared in that "primordial soup" consisting of some body of water loaded with chemicals necessary for the start of life. This "warm little pond" was believed to have been struck by an electrical discharge (the energy source) which caused the chemicals to form complex protein molecules, which eventually brought forth life. From this first life, evolutionists hypothesize, all other life on Earth evolved. Never mind how water formed on Earth, we will only unravel just so much in this article.

Now, we have finally reached solid evidence to examine, which is the fossil record of past life forms, and the evidence of past geologic ages on Earth. We have tangible data, but secular science has its own conclusions concerning that data. Science concludes that since the simplest organisms of life appear at the what is considered that earliest periods of time that Earth was inhabitable (maybe about 1 Billion BC), and the life forms found seems to become more complex and abundant as time progresses, that this constitutes the “fact” of evolution. Never mind that the theory allows for the fully formed species to be much more abundant, and the expected transitional forms are extremely hard to find, or are actually non-existent. If there were transitional forms, they should be just as easy to find, and abundant, as the other fossils.

Enough about evolution. What about the “Observations of Moses”? Well, we have to clarify some things first. Those that try to compare creationism with evolution do not understand the facts. Creationism is the undisciplined doctrine that the Holy Bible (Genesis) teaches how God created the Earth. That is false. There are no “creation accounts” in Genesis, as stated by the “foremost terrestrial authority” on the book. Genesis states that God created our universe, but it does not give us details on the process. It only gives us the amount of time (144 hours) it took to complete. What we can gather is that the supernatural realm, gave birth to our natural existence, about 4.6 billion years ago.

What Genesis does give us is what we will call the Observations of Moses (OM). God showed Moses, on Mt. Sinai in 1598 BC, six days from the ancient past which Moses would later write down (or have written) in the book of Genesis. Theology mistakenly calls them the “Six Days of Creation”, but that too is false, because bible scholars, other creationists, and theologians do not understand the text, and have misled mankind into thinking that early Genesis is just “folklore”.

What mankind in general does not know is that God was defining geologic time to Moses, but Moses did not understand Centuries before mankind discovered the fossil record (of death), and the notion of the Geologic Time Scale, the only account of prehistoric history was given to the chosen nation of Israel. God did not show Moses how the sphere of outer space and our Earth was created, but showed him one day from each of the different past geologic ages of time, as defined by God, in biblical order…, not chronological order.

Science teachers are required to learn and teach their students the suppositions of biological and stellar evolution, and exclude what is taught in Genesis. Why? Is it because there is no evidence? They can’t say that, because Genesis reveals the previous living existence of fossils of the life forms that mankind would later find in the geologic strata, and also declares the existence of life forms that have not yet been discovered, such as prehistoric mankind of 20+ million years ago.

The Observations of Moses tell us that God created different life forms on Earth in each of seven different geologic ages in which He defines. The Eternal Spirit allowed Moses to be the only modern human to see those prehistoric animals, living as they were in the geologic age in which they lived on Earth. This is why there are no “transitional forms”, because when a total extinction occurred to all surface life, God would created new life forms out of the ground to replace them, after an interval of time.

Every state governor and their educational supervising administrators were contacted in the fall of 2005 about this. Yet none of them have taken any step to secure training for their teachers. They continue to allow indoctrination of their students in the prejudice of secular science, which refuses to investigate the reality of our origins. A twelve hour course is available for science teachers in order to help them to give a more balanced education to their students.

If we learn nothing else, please be advised that there is no such controversy between evolution and creationism. The correct “matchups” are the combined theories of both the Big Bang and Nebular Breakdown against Biblical Creation, and also evolution against the Observations of Moses. With the discovery of extras-solar planets, the Nebular theory has fallen out of favor. Perhaps with future discoveries, other current theories will be discarded as well.

Share/Save/Bookmark
       Post to Facebook


Important: The material on Best Syndication is for informational purposes only and is not meant to be advice. Authors may have or will receive monetary compensation from the company's product/s mentioned. You should always seek professional advice before making any legal, financial or medical decisions and this website cannot substitute or replace any trained professional consultation. Use of this site means that you agree to our TERMS OF SERVICE

 


Advertise On This Site

Copyright © 2006-2014 By Best Syndication All Rights Reserved