Classic rock at 123Posters.com  

Home  Top Stories  Sports  Entertainment  Health News  Business  Personal Finance 
Real Estate  Business Finance  Insurance  Consulting 
Tax News  Forum


 

Writers






 


Featured Articles







BUSINESS



 

 
Use Your GI Bill

 

 

A Religion of Peace and Tolerance!

January 12th, 2006

A RELIGION OF PEACE AND TOLERANCE!

Islamic symbol

Ibrahim Hoopercrit of CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) says Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance. The Grand Imam of Al-Azhar University in Cairo, Mohammed Sayed Tantawi, says Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance. John Esposito, Professor of International Affairs and Islamic Studies at Georgetown University, says Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance. Could they be wrong: these Three Wise Men? Okay, maybe they are not so wise, but there are three of them. How about Athos, Porthos, and Aramis, the Three Islmo-teers; or better yet, in the absence of incense and myrrh but not smoke and mirrors—Larry, Moe and Curly?

First things first: If Islam is a religion of peace then Hitler’s Das Reich Division was an SS athletic club that traveled across Europe entertaining non-believers with fireworks displays. What Mohammed did to the original occupants of Mecca and Khaybar was what SS Gruppenfuhrer Jurgen Stroop did to the Warsaw Ghetto in 1943 though no one referred to him as the merciful and the beneficent. The Spanish Inquisition took f ewer lives in 350 years than Islam’s Islamo-fascist terrorists take in an average 12-month spree. Oh, sure, Islam is a religion of peace—and Billy Martin never got into a barroom brawl after nine innings of kicking dirt on some blind bastard’s shoes.

 

Peaceful religions don’t destroy giant Buddhas; they don’t turn churches and synagogues into stables—yet that is precisely what happened in Bosnia and Kosovo. Martyrs willing to die for a peaceful religion don’t tear pages from the Holy Book of another religion to use as toilet paper—yet that is precisely what happened when Islam’s moral and mental cretins invaded the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem. No peaceful religion would tolerate such behavior on the part of any of its flock; it would not cheer them; it would condemn them. For the record, Islam expended far more energy cheering the blasphemers of the Church of the Nativity than condemning them.

No member of Saudi Barbaria’s Royal Family ever traveled to Europe or Washington bearing an olive branch. When they visit the dar al-harb they bring petrodollars to build hate-spewing mosques and Mad-Rats-Asses schools and to endow Middle East Studies programs so dhimmis like John Esposito can act learned while dispensing propaganda that would have had Joseph Goebbels snickering. There are former Muslims who insist Islam is not peaceful, never has been, and insist further that Islam is not a religion. But that can be left to a further debate.

Second proposition: Is Islam a tolerant religion? It depends on what one means by tolerant. College freshmen should ponder this while watching Fahrenheit 9/11 and then try to define tolerance. A million dead Christian and animists in Sudan answer the tolerance question with an emphatic NO! If fact, Al Capone had more tolerance for Bugs Moran than Sudan’s Islamic Misanthropic Theocrats have for animism. A religion that eschews a spiritual world including rocks and cornstalks yet believes trees will tell them where the Jews are hiding so that they can kill them, is not only ridiculous, it is absurd. A five-year-old dhimmi who puts his faith in Tinker Bell is further along the road to tolerance and sanity than someone who believes in jinns and stoolpigeon trees.

 

And how tolerant is Islam of the People of the Book (Christians and Jews) when the Qur’an says 5:35 “Believers, fear Allah and seek the way to approach Him, striving hard, fighting Jihad (that word again!) with all your might in His Cause that you may be successful. As for the disbelievers (previously defined as Christians), if they had everything on earth, two times over, to give as ransom for the penalty of the Day of Doom, it would never be accepted from them. Theirs will be a painful torment. They will desire to get out of the fire, but they shall not be released from it. They shall have an everlasting torture.”

Pat Garrett was more tolerant of Billy the Kid; Richard Nixon was more tolerant of Woodward and Bernstein; Andrew Jackson was more tolerant of John C. Calhoun and he would have hung Calhoun if he had had the chance. Go back to: “It would not be accepted of them.” This is what defines Islam—tolerance without acceptance.

Garrett not only tolerated Billy Bonney, he accepted him as a youth who had gone wrong; Nixon may have despised Woodward and Bernstein, but he accepted them for what they were—journalists; Jackson knew, by the Eternal, that Calhoun was a politician and a damn good one—almost as good as Old Hickory. Without acceptance toleration is a sham. The Qur’an consigns all non-believers to a painful torment and that includes John Esposito.

Article 18(a) of the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam says: “Everyone shall have the right to live in security for himself, his religion, his dependents, his honour and his property.” Article 19(a) says, “All individuals are equal before the law, without distinction between the ruler and the ruled.”  Article 22(a) says, “Everyone has the right to express his opinion freely in such manner as would not be contrary to the principles of the Shari’ah.”

 

Shari’ah?  Does Tweety Bird smell a rat?

Article 24 says, “All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Shari’ah.”

 “I did! I did smell a rat!” Oh, yes—a large rat; a very large rat, an intolerant rat.

There is no tolerance for non-Muslims in Islam—there is no acceptance, only an everlasting torture.

Nikita Khrushchev said he would bury the West; he was an honest man. Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has also promised to bury the West; he is also an honest man, but probably insane. Someone should give him a copy of Nikky’s memoirs. It would advance the cause of world peace and tolerance if Hoopercrit, Tantawi, and Esposito would say what they really mean. How long could it take—ten seconds? What are they afraid of? No matter how harsh, no matter how unyielding, the Qur’an will back them up 100 percent and the Free World would still tolerate them. Is that so bad? Well, yes, for those who want to be masters of the world, tolerance is not enough—they must be accepted!

Comment on this Article at our Forum

Submit your own Article

  RSS Feeds to Commentary New

  RSS Feed to all of our News

Add to Google Add to My AOL
Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add this feed to Your C-Net

By Denis Schulz
Freelance Writer  Contact Denis

 

 

Keywords and misspellings:  politics poletics democrat demoncrat republican izlam muslim muzlim islimic mohammed muhamed muhammed


Google
 
Web BestSyndication.com

About   Contact   site map

Copyright 2005 Best Syndication                                            Last Updated Saturday, July 10, 2010 09:46 PM